Legal Opinion

State v. Yosua

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 6, 1940No. 3183PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

I. In the course of his opening statement, counsel for the defendant asserted that the crime charged could not be established unless it appeared that there was “such heedlessness and such a degree of carelessness, such gross carelessness that it amounts to a conscious disregard for the consequences and you twelve men in your experience in life know pretty well what the law seeks to do in felonies, serious crimes. It seeks to punish the wicked or the guilty mind ....” The County Solicitor interrupted at this point with the objection “you haven’t got to have intent or any mind of guilt.” With…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burnham v. StillingsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911
  2. State v. GilbertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  3. Whipple v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
  4. State v. RyanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1899
  5. State v. CornishSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PelkySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  2. State v. EtzweilerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API