Legal Opinion

(PC) Stephen v. Montejo

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 12, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01796Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JIMMIE STEPHEN, No. 2:18-cv-01796 KJM DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 E. MONTEJO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”) with a civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendant was deliberately 19 indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Before the court 20 is defendant’s motion to revoke plaintiff’s IFP status. For the reasons set forth…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Andrews v. CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. Daniel ParamoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Robert Bruno Ciarpaglini v. Doctor Narinder Saini, Doctor Laurens D. Young, and Phil KingstonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Taylor v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API