Shaner v. Tucson Airport Authority, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a directed verdict in favor of the appellees (defendants below). No evidence was presented at the trial. The motion for a directed verdict followed the opening statement of counsel for the plaintiff. The trial court gave counsel the opportunity to supplement the opening statement and he did so. The granting of a defense motion for directed verdict following a plaintiff’s opening statement has been approved when it is apparent that the plaintiff cannot present sufficient evidence to sustain a verdict in his favor. Slade v.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scott v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Rempfer v. Deerfield Packing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Trollope v. KoernerArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Purcell v. ZimbelmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- E. L. Jones Construction Co. v. NolandArizona Supreme Court · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McClung v. Delta Square Ltd. PartnershipTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Taylor v. HockerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Hopkinson v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Souza v. Fred Carries Contracts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.