Legal Opinion

Crum v. McCollum

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 9, 1930No. 40318PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWagneR, J.

The defendant Roy V. McCollum is the owner of an Essex automobile, which, at the time of the collision, was being operated with his consent,'by his wife, the other defendant. At the time of the collision, the plaintiff was riding in a Ford coupe, which was registered in the name of her husband. There is testimony that the car belongs to both Mr. and Mrs. Crum. The collision occurred in the intersection of Thirty-eighth Street and Cottage Grove Avenue, in the city of Des Moines. Cottage Grove Avenue runs east and west, and the two streets intersect at right angles. The Methodist Church is…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Crim v. CrimSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  2. McCormack v. MolburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  3. Wallace v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  4. Kelly v. Chicago Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. McKinney v. HerrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Syester v. BantaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  2. Bolton v. ZieglerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
  3. Preston v. HowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  4. Phillips v. WerndorffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. United States v. TholenDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API