Legal Opinion

In Re Constance W.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1986No. 885Published

1Opinion of the Court

351 Pa. Superior Ct. 393 (1986)

506 A.2d 405

In re CONSTANCE W.

Appeal of Gary HOOVER, Father.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued October 30, 1985.

Filed January 31, 1986.

Thomas C. Panian and B. Kirk Holman, California, for appellant.

Gregory C. Hook, Waynesburg, for appellee.

Before WIEAND, DEL SOLE and HESTER, JJ.

DEL SOLE, Judge:

Before this Court is the propriety of an order suspending the natural father's visitation rights of his daughter, Constance W., for a period of one year. For the following reasons, we reverse.

The facts pertinent to our review are: prior to the child's birth on November…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Spriggs v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Robinson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Com. Ex Rel. Myers v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API