Lusby v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado
At Law. On motion for new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtPhilips, J.
This is an action for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff w’hile a passenger on one of defendant’s freight trains running from Pueblo, Colo., to the town of Coolidge, in the state of Kansas. The case was tried by a jury, before Hallett, J. Verdict for plaintiff. The case now stands on motion for new trial; and, by request of Judge Halijstt, I sat with him on the hearing of this motion. Not having time and opportunity, while holding court at Denver, to confer with him respecting the motion, at his request I submit for his consideration the views entertained by me respecting the merits…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Kellogg v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
- Robert Boyce, in Error v. Paul Anderson, in ErrorSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Flynn v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pasley v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- German-American Filter Co. v. ErdrichU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1899