Legal Opinion

Heeren v. Smith

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 4, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Plaintiffs in error purchased a farm from the defendants in error on April 24, 1928, paying $5,000 in cash, and giving a mortgage to the Woodriver National Bank for $5,500, the balance of the purchase price. The mortgage contained a clause for accelerating the original five-year maturity upon default in the payment of interest or taxes. Plaintiffs in error made the payments called for until 1932, when they defaulted in the payment of interest and taxes. On November 7, 1932, defendants in error, assignees of the mortgage, filed a bill to foreclose the mortgage in the circuit court of Madison…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carpenters' Union v. Citizens Committee to Enforce the Landis AwardIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Keithley v. Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Bielby v. BielbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Grubb v. MilanIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Miller v. SutliffIllinois Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heist v. Dunlap CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. SchildgenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. FEDERAL NAT. MORTG. ASS'N v. SchildgenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Southgate Bank v. WoodenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API