Legal Opinion

Kirsner v. Edelmann

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 13, 1985No. 216, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.

On this appeal, Milton F. Kirsner, appellant, challenges the judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City ordering that he pay $500.00 toward the counsel fees incurred by John Charles L. Edelmann, appellee, in defending the action initiated by Kirsner. Also at issue is Edelmann’s Motion for Payment of Cost and Counsel Fee By Appellant, which seeks recovery of counsel fees incurred in the defense of this appeal. We will affirm the judgment below, but because we have not been provided with sufficient information in support of Edelmann’s motion for counsel fees arising…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Swisher v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pulley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Eastgate Associates v. ApperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Rand v. RandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Bullock v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Plank v. CherneskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Aventis Pasteur, Inc. v. SkevofilaxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. State v. ChaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Thomas v. City of AnnapolisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Maxima Corp. v. 6933 Arlington Development Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API