Robinson v. Weiland
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtCohen, J.
We review whether the trial court exceeded this court’s mandate issued in Robinson v. Weiland, 936 So.2d 777 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Because the trial court’s actions on remand exceeded our mandate, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
The facts of the underlying dispute were set out in the earlier opinion. In short, the dispute began as an interpleader action filed by two annuity companies seeking a determination of entitlement to the proceeds of two annuities purchased by the decedent, John S. Cetrano. The decedent’s sister, Ramona Robinson, claimed 100 percent of the proceeds, while the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mercer v. RaineSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- BLACKHAWK HEAT. & P. CO., INC. v. Data Lease Fin. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1975
- The Florida Bar v. MillerSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- CCI v. America II Electronics, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- The Florida Bar v. RoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Russell v. McQueenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. SidranDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- State v. GomezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Ford Motor Co. v. StimpsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Francois v. University of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016