Legal Opinion
Russell v. McQueen
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 21, 2013No. 5D11-4429PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSawaya, J.
The first appearance of the underlying paternity action in this court two years ago resulted in an opinion that specified five errors regarding the computation of child support that required correction on remand. Russell v. McQueen, 62 So.3d 683, 683 (Fla. 6th DCA 2011) (Russell I). Of those errors, the following two are pertinent to our review in this current appeal: twice charging the father, Harold Russell (Father), for the child’s unreimbursed medical expenses; and failing to properly calculate Father’s income for 2006 and 2007. Id. Despite this court’s opinion explaining these errors,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- BLACKHAWK HEAT. & P. CO., INC. v. Data Lease Fin. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1975
- CORPORATION v. Village of North Palm BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Cone v. ConeSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Mendelson v. MendelsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Doyle v. DoyleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- S.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Dep't of Revenue ex rel. Shorter v. AmicoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Dep't of Revenue ex rel. Shorter v. AmicoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Hearns v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Martinez v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013