Legal Opinion

Federal Trade Commission v. Intellipay, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided February 8, 1993No. Civ. A. H-92-2325PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROSENTHAL, District Judge.

Pending before this court is the motion of De Nisco & Associates and Gerald P. De Nisco (collectively referred to as “De Nisco”) to withdraw as counsel of record. (Docket Entry No. 96). After careful review of the facts, parties’ submissions, and applicable case law, this court finds that this motion must be denied. Aso pending before this court is defendants’ motion to extend time for filing a response to plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. (Docket Entry No. 97). The court grants this motion; defendants must file a response within ten days…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Suzanne Ogla Broughten v. Grover Voss, Ruden, Barnett, McClosky & Schuster, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Streetman v. LynaughDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1987
  3. Wynn v. ErikssonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Autoficio, LLC v. Cimble Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2021
  2. Autoficio, LLC v. Cimble Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2020
  3. Considerate Commerce Inc v. ISP Electronics LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2025
  4. Cunningham v. Headstart Warranty Group, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024
  5. Edwards v. OliverDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API