Legal Opinion
Felix Ramirez, et al. v. Activehours, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 25, 2026No. 5:25-cv-03625Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FELIX RAMIREZ, et al., Case No. 25-cv-03625-PCP 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 ACTIVEHOURS, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 35, 60 Defendant. 11 12 Plaintiffs Felix Ramirez and Michael Collins bring this class action complaint against 13 defendant Activehours, Inc., doing business as EarnIn, for violations of the Truth in Lending Act 14 (TILA), the Military Lending Act (MLA), and the Illinois Predatory Loan Prevention Act 15 (IPLPA). Plaintiffs argue that EarnIn engages in a “systematic nationwide policy and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.