Legal Opinion
United States v. Karp
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 7, 1980No. 79 Cr. 722PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.
The defendant is charged with conspiracy to defraud the Internal Revenue Service by creating fictitious business transactions to be used by other taxpayers. It is essential to the government’s case to establish that these transactions were in fact fictitious. Among other things, the government will wish to prove that they are supported by no valid documentation. In this context, the government asks us to compel the defendant Karp to honor a subpoena duces tecum calling for the production of all invoices and other documents defendant now has in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States of America and Donald M. Cerra, Special Agent of the Internal Revenue Service v. John L. Beattie, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- In Re Special Grand Jury No. 1, Impanelled December, 1977 TermDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1978
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Hiram Stanley Sasser, IICourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Ray M. Vargas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, Etc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Served February 27, 1984District Court, E.D. Washington · 1984
- United States v. BarthDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.