Legal Opinion

State v. Gifford

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 16, 2002No. 2001-392PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.

This is an interlocutory transfer without ruling from the Superior Court {Galway, J.). At issue is the criminal responsibility of a twenty-two-year-old defendant for acts allegedly committed when the defendant was thirteen years old. We hold that RSA 628:1 does not bar prosecution of the defendant and the certification requirement must be satisfied despite the language of RSA 169-B:4, VII.

The relevant facts follow. In November 2000, the defendant, Matthew Gifford, was indicted for aggravated felonious sexual assault, a crime he allegedly committed between August 1990 and May 1992 when he was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. FarrowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  2. In Re GambleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. State v. PowellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  4. State v. FergusonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Garand v. Town of ExeterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  2. State v. Rollins-ErcolinoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  4. In re D.K., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  5. State v. RixSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API