Hosmane v. Seley-Radtke
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtRaker, J.
In this defamation case of a private person and not a public figure, the primary question we address is the burden of proof a plaintiff must meet in order to overcome a qualified or conditional privilege. Appellant maintains the appropriate burden of proof is the preponderance of evidence standard; appellee maintains that standard is clear and convincing evidence. .
Appellant Ramachandra S. Hosmane, Ph.D., appeals from the jury verdict in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County in favor of appellee Katherine Seley-Radtke, Ph.D., on one count of defamation and one count of invasion of privacy,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Batson v. ShiflettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Jacron Sales Co. v. SindorfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Derek Harvey v. CNNCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Seley-Radtke v. HosmaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Lindenmuth v. McCreerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Allison L. Cordell v. SAS Institute Inc., ET AL.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026
- Andra “Ana” Cheri Rose, et al. v. Unplugged Sport Bar and Restaurant Inc, et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.