Legal Opinion

MacCormack v. Robins Construction

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 22, 1974No. 2012-1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, C.J.

The Whatcom County Superior Court, acting sua sponte, transformed a suit brought under the Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86.010, et seq., into a claim for damages based on a common-law breach of warranty theory and granted monetary relief. Defendants Robins Construction and its agent Richard Fairbanks and his wife appeal from an $11,875 judgment entered against them.

Plaintiffs brought suit after discovering deficiencies in houses located in a Whatcom County subdivision which had been constructed and sold to them by defendants. At the close of plaintiffs’ case, which involved only issues…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harding v. WillWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Tuschoff v. WestoverWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Hill v. HillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Allen v. American Land ResearchWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Green v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Green v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. State v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API