Legal Opinion

McCurry v. Keith

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 13, 1997No. 2611PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, Judge:

In this action for recovery of video poker gambling losses, Jane Davenport McCurry sued Dennie W. Keith and Cynthia' S. Keith for $8,560. McCurry appeals the trial judge’s finding that the Keiths were entitled to a $5,000 setoff representing McCurry’s winnings. We affirm.

Facts

McCurry brought this action for recovery of video poker gambling losses against the Keiths on January 7, 1991. The trial judge granted summary judgment in favor of the Keiths. McCurry appealed the order to this court which reversed and remanded for a trial on the merits. McCurry v. Keith, 312 S.C. 254, 439…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Berkebile v. OutenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Watts v. MalatestaNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Petty v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. SomersetSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  5. Elias v. GillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lee v. Thermal Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Cheap-O's Truck Stop, Inc. v. CloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Upchurch v. UpchurchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Proctor v. Whitlark & Whitlark, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  5. Marietta Garage, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API