Watts v. Malatesta
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCrouch, J.
The action is under section 994 of the Penal Law to recover money paid by plaintiff to defendant upon the event of prohibited wagers or bets. Plaintiff proved conclusively that on divers dates and occasions from April 28, 1928, to April 17,1930, he had paid defendant, a bookmaker, various sums of money aggregating $37,535 for wagers lost upon a series of horse races. The defendant adduced evidence which, it may be assumed, warranted a finding that during the same period defendant lost and paid to plaintiff like wagers aggregating a much larger sum. It was the contention of the defendant,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- People v. . StedekerNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- People v. . BrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Ruckman v. . PitcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
- Storey v. . BrennanNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Intercontinental Hotels Corp. v. GoldenNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Hofferman v. SimmonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Majlinger v. Cassino Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. FormatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Klein v. Morris Plan Industrial BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.