Legal Opinion

Tunica County v. Hampton Co. National Surety, LLC

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 2009No. 2008-CA-00756-SCTPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMAR, Justice,

for the Court.

¶ 1. This appeal involves a dispute between a bail-bonding company and its agent and the sheriff of Tunica County. The question presented is whether a county sheriff has the authority to refuse to accept bonds written by a professional bond agent, who is licensed as a limited surety agent with the Mississippi Department of Insurance. The trial court found that the sheriff did not have such discretion and granted both declaratory and in-junctive relief for the bondsman. Finding error, we reverse.

FACTUAL HISTORY

¶2. James Hampton Gardner is a professional bond agent…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. v. BattleMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Roberts v. Miss. Rep. Party State Exec. Comm.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hampton Co. Nat. Sur., LLC v. Tunica County, Miss.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  4. Lenoir v. Madison CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  5. MS GAMING COM'N v. Imperial Palace of Mississippi, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Buckel v. ChaneyMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Terry Pitchford v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Tyrone Lewis v. Hinds County Circuit CourtMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Tellus Operating Group, LLC v. Texas Petroleum Investment Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2012
  5. McGlothin v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API