Legal Opinion

McGlothin v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 31, 2019No. 18-60338PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:

At issue in this diversity action is whether, as the district court concluded, two sections of Mississippi's Uninsured Motorist (UM) Act, Mississippi Code §§ 83-11-101 et seq ., are repugnant: §§ 83-11-101(1) (requiring automobile insurers provide UM coverage to extent insured is "legally entitled to recover") and 83-11-103(c)(vi) (defining "uninsured motor vehicle", as used in UM Act, to include vehicle "owned or operated by a person protected by immunity under the Mississippi Tort Claims Act"). State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company maintains:…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. John Doe v. DeRay MckessonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  2. Alston v. Prairie Farms Dairy, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2021
  3. American Compensation Insurance Company v. RuizDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2022
  4. Bailey v. Federated Rural Electric Insurance ExchangeDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2019
  5. Benjamin Robinson v. Holmes County, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API