Legal Opinion

In re the Rehabilitation of Lawyers Title & Guaranty Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.

The court’s holding that the certificate holders possessed an equitable lien upon the title company’s undivided interest in the bond and mortgage for rents wrongfully recouped was not based upon the theory of tracing trust funds but, as stated in the opinion (157 Misc. 516), upon the principle that a tenant in common has an equitable lien upon rents collected by a cotenant for the portion wrongfully withheld by the latter. This lien should include interest on moneys improperly retained. How*487ever, interest should run only up to the date of the order of rehabilitation except that a proportionate…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Rehabilitation of Lawyers Title & Guaranty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Liquidation of Lawyers Title & Guaranty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API