Legal Opinion
In re the Rehabilitation of Lawyers Title & Guaranty Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 12, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.
The claims of the petitioner fall into two distinct categories: (1) Moneys alleged to have been improperly recouped by the title company and its rehabilitator from rents properly belonging to the certificate holders, and (2) claims for damages based upon the alleged breach by the title company and its rehabilitator of the provisions of the certificates.
The title company (Lawyers Title and Guaranty Company) is at present in the hands of the Superintendent of Insurance, as rehabilitator. It is not in the process of liquidation. As this court has already observed (Matter of Lawyers Title &…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of People (Tit. Mtge. Guar. Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- In re PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1934
- In re PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1934
- Pitman v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Liquidation of New York Title & Mortgage Co.New York Supreme Court · 1936
- More v. Western Connecticut Title & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- In re the Liquidation of Lawyers Title & Guaranty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937
- In re the Rehabilitation of Lawyers Title & Guaranty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1936
- Land Title Bank & Trust Co. v. Robinson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1938