Legal Opinion

Aaronson v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

— This is an action on a policy of burglary insurance in the sum of $500. Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment in the amount of the policy together with a penally of $50 and'$150 attorney’s fees. Defendant has appealed.

The insuring clause of the policy reads as follows:

“$500 to loss of property from within the premises when the assured or at least one employee is on duty. ”

Under the heading of “Standard Combination Messenger and Interior Robbery Rider Insuring Clauses” appears the following:

“B. For all Loss by Robbery, occurring at any time during the hours beginning at 7 A. M., and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. North British & Mercantile Insurance v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  2. State Ex Rel. Jenkins v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  3. Home Ins. Co. v. FlewellenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Nahigian v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. S & M Lamp Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Pruzan v. National Surety CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Miller v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API