Legal Opinion
Miller v. American Bonding Co. of Baltimore
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided December 8, 1958No. 46812PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OSDOL, Commissioner.
Plaintiffs, partners, doing business under the firm name of Standard Awning Company with place of business on Prospect Avenue in Kansas City, were issued an insurance policy by defendant American Bonding Company of Baltimore indemnifying plaintiffs against loss through any fraudulent or dishonest act of any of plaintiffs’ employees. It was stipulated in the insurance contract (Section 4) that the “Assured shall keep verifiable records of all property covered by this Policy.”
There was evidence tending to show that between Saturday afternoon, January 17th, and Monday…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Noland v. Buffalo Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Reliable Auto Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Burnett v. American Central InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
- Green's Hotel, Inc. v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Pruzan v. National Surety CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Batts Restaurant, Inc. v. Commercial Insurance Company of NewarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. Ponsell's Drug Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1964
- Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Co. v. LindseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1973
- S & M Lamp Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962