Legal Opinion

Harrisburg School District No. 6 v. Neal

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 26, 2011No. 11-75PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL E. DANIELSON, Justice.

| Appellants Harrisburg School District No. 6; along with Frankie Lindsey, Fonda Eaton, Barry Massengil, Greg Reddman, in their official capacities as members of the board of education of Harrisburg School District No. 6 (hereinafter collectively “The Harrisburg District”), appeal from the order of the Poinsett County Circuit Court granting appellee Byron Neal’s motion for summary judgment. The Harrisburg District argues on appeal that the circuit court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Neal. We find no error and affirm the order of the circuit court.

In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kinchen v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Evans v. HambySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Couch v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Central Oklahoma Pipeline, Inc. v. Hawk Field Services, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  2. Berryhill v. SynatzskeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Hardin v. BishopSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  4. Skalla v. CanepariSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  5. Nelson v. Arkansas Rural Medical Practice Loan & Scholarship BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API