Legal Opinion
Mitchell Bros. Truck Lines v. United States
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 13, 1971No. Civ. Nos. 70-618, 70-865PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALFRED T. GOODWIN, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Mitchell and Ashworth brought these actions in Oregon and Utah respectively to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission granting four intervening defendants authority to transport “size and weight” commodities throughout various Western states. The challenged order is reported in Dealers Transit, Inc., Ext. — Eight Western States, 110 M.C.C. 317 (1969).
The two cases have been consolidated in this court because they both challenge the same I.C.C. order and both present the same legal issues. A three-judge court was empaneled…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Illinois Central Railroad v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Elfbrandt v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Mitchell Bros. Truck Lines v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1963
- Carolina Freight Carriers Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1971
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hilt Truck Line, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Twin City Freight, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1972
- Appleyard's Motor Transportation Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Appleyard's Motor Transportation Co., Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Greenstein Trucking Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.