Bingham & G. Ry. Co. v. North Utah Mining Co. of Bingham
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. F. C. Loofbourow, Judge. 'Condemnation proceedings by the Bingham & Garfield Railway Company against the North Utah Mining Company of Bingham, William Robbins, and others. From separate ' judgments for damages in favor of the Mining Company and Robbins, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
The plaintiff, a corporation, in August, 1910, commenced this proceeding under our statute to condemn a certain strip of ground, a portion of which is indicated by what are designated as tracts A and B, for railroad purposes. Tracts A and B, which are more particularly in question here, extend over certain mining claims which are owned by the defendant North Utah Mining Company of Bingham, a mining corporation, and in which claims or tracts aforesaid the defendant William Robbins claimed some interest as lessee. The claims of the other two defendants are not material now.
In plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Montana Railway Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Kansas Central Railway Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Railway Co. v. Telford's ExecutorsTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Southern Ry. v. BeaudrotSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Utah Copper Co. v. Stephen Hayes Estate, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1934
- Shurtleff v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- Gillman Ex Rel. Gillman v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1971