Legal Opinion

United States v. Jeffrey Ramos Samuel Acosta

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 5, 2006No. 05-1169PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

(April 5,2006)

The United States of America (“government”) appeals from the order of the District Court of the Virgin Islands granting defendants Jeffrey Ramos and Samuel Acosta’s motion to suppress evidence. Because there was reasonable suspicion justifying the stop, we will reverse.

I

Members of the Street Enforcement Team of the Virgin Islands Police Department were patrolling the Castle Coakley area in an unmarked SUV when they observed two vehicles, a van and a Honda Accord, parked next to each other in the parking lot of a night club. Upon passing in-between the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. Hawkins (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. United States v. Warren Green, IVCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  3. Edmond v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. United States v. Airrington SykesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  5. Com. v. Shaw, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API