Legal Opinion
Harold Levinson Associates, Inc. v. Chao
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 22, 2002No. Docket No. 01-6105PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED in part, and VACATED AND REMANDED in part.
The defendants appeal the decision of the District Court following a bench trial finding the defendants liable for a failure properly to pay overtime compensation as required by 29 U.S.C. § 207(a), and awarding total damages of $991,669.16 to plaintiff for distribution to employees and to former employees of the defendants. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the District Court’s finding of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- LeBlanc v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Ronald L. Howard, Scott R. Kincaid, Donald M. Loftus v. City of Springfield, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Reich v. Southern New England Telecommunications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Jemine v. DennisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- McGlone v. Contract Callers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Scott v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Alvarez Bocon v. 419 Manhattan Avenue LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Amador v. 109-19 Food Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2025
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.