Olmsted, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtClaussen, C. J.
This action is based upon a conspiracy. The appeal can be disposed of by an examination of the facts for the purpose of ascertaining whether anything was done pursuant to the ■alleged conspiracy which is actionable. This court is committed to the rule that a conspiracy cannot be the subject of a civil action unless something is done pursuant to it which, without the conspiracy, would give a right of action. Beechley v. Mulville, 102 Iowa 602, 70 N. W. 107, 71 N. W. 428, 63 Am. St. Rep. 479; De Wulf v. Dix, 110 Iowa 553, 81 N. W. 779; Jayne v. Drorbaugh, 63 Iowa 711, 17 N. W. 433; Dunshee v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dunshee v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Jayne v. DrorbaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Beechley v. MulvilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- De Wulf v. DixSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
3Cited by15 opinions
- Beck v. PrupisSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harding v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Falstaff Brewing Corp. v. Iowa Fruit & Produce Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Neff v. World Publishing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Neustadt v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.