Gunter v. Willingham
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quiluian, Judge.
In his enumeration of errors the defendant, appellant here, contends he was entitled to a directed verdict for two reasons. However, only one ground was urged in the motion for directed verdict and we confine our discussion to it. See Sunbrand Supply Co. v. Garment &c. Corp., 99 Ga. App. 72, 75 (107 SE2d 680); Crown Carpet Mills v. C. E. Goodroe Co., 108 Ga. App. 327 (1) (132 SE2d 824).
It is argued that “the plaintiff’s evidence shows conclusively that the proximate cause of her son’s injuries was unknown.” A police officer, although not qualified as an expert, testified that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Sears, Roebuck & Company v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Carroll v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Dowis v. McCurdyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fuels, Inc. v. RutlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Lurlee, Inc. v. Pernoshal-39 Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Gibbs v. GianarisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Tillman & Deal Farm Supply, Inc. v. DealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978