Legal Opinion
Novak v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 27, 2009No. Civil Action No. 06-4841PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHERIDAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiff, Edward Novak’s, motion for class certification. For the following reasons, this Court denies Plaintiffs motion.
I
The named plaintiff, Edward Novak, brings this class action claim on behalf of all Merchandising Assistant Store Managers (MASMs), current and former, who were employed by Home Depot in the State of New Jersey from August 25, 2002 to the present. Novak is a New Jersey resident who previously was employed by Home Depot in the position of MASM.
Defendant, Home Depot, is a Delaware corporation…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Baby Neal v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clougher v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Ottaviano v. Home Depot, Inc., USADistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Kalow & Springut, LLP v. Commence Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Huyer v. Wells Fargo & Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2013