Legal Opinion
Kalow & Springut, LLP v. Commence Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 28, 2011No. Civil Action No. 07-3442 (FLW)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLFSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Kalow & Springnut, LLP (“Plaintiff’ or “Kalow”) brings the instant putative class action suit against Defendant Commence Corporation (“Defendant” or “Commence”) to recover damages arising from the alleged failure of computer software that Plaintiff purchased from Defendant. Essentially, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant intentionally placed a “time bomb” to disable the *400software, and as a result, Plaintiff alleges that the users of the software suffered various damages. In the instant matter, Plaintiff seeks certification of a single class of all users…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Peruto v. Timbertech Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- FILGUEIRAS v. MIDLAND FUNDING, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- GOULD v. THE GUIDA-SEIBERT DAIRY COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund, Inc. v. Navient CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- SCHULTZ, JR. v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.