National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Oil & Gas Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentHolmes, Circuit Judge
I concur in the opinion of the court that the Board had jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the parties, and properly directed the re-employment of Bebermeyer with reimbursement for the time lost, but I dissent from the conclusion that the order is ambiguous or not properly framed, and that enforcement thereof should be delayed until further action by the Board.
I think the order of the Board is wholly valid and should be enforced without any modification. It was made upon findings, fully supported by evidence, that respondents were engaged in unfair labor practices affecting commerce,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Associated Press v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Washington, Virginia & Maryland Coach Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Agwilines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.