Legal Opinion

Dean v. Gadsden Times Publishing Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 11, 1973No. 72-1310PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner sued respondent, his employer, to recover compensation lost as a result of the employee’s being required to serve as a juror. An Alabama statute provides that an employee excused for jury duty “shall be entitled to his usual compensation received from such employment less the fee or compensation he received for serving” as a juror. Ala. Code of 1940, Tit. 30, §7(1) (Supp. 1971). It appears that petitioner served on a jury, received pay for the jury duty and submitted a bill of $63 to respondent, the difference between his regular wages and his jury pay. Respondent refused to pay;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Coppage v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Gadsden Times Publishing Corporation v. DeanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Gresham Park Community Organization, Simon E. Parker, MacY B. Lee and Calvin E. Sims v. Gary Howell D/B/A Southeast Package Number TwoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. State Ex Rel. Schneider v. LiggettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  4. Blue v. McBrideSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  5. Rushton Mining Company v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Interior, United Mine Workers of America, District No. 2, Local Union 1520, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API