Legal Opinion
Rushton Mining Company v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Interior, United Mine Workers of America, District No. 2, Local Union 1520, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 30, 1975No. 74-1703, 74-1704PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge.
Having exhausted its administrative remedies, the Rushton Mining Company petitions this court, pursuant to 30 U.S. C.A. § 816(a) (1971), 1 to set aside two decisions of the Interior Board of Mine Operations Appeals, dated June 20 and June 27, 1974. In both decisions the Board determined that miners idled by § 814(b) withdrawal orders are entitled to partial compensation under the first two sentences of § 820(a), even if the § 814(b) orders were subsequently vacated. The petitioner believes these decisions to be inconsistent with the Federal Coal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LambertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Sworob v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Clinchfield Coal Company v. Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, United Mine Workers of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- District 6, United Mine Workers of America v. United States Department of the Interior Board of Mine Operations AppealsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Marshall v. Whirlpool Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.