Legal Opinion

Fudali v. Pivotal Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 14, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2003-1460Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) MARJORIE FUDALI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 03-1460 (JMF) ) PIVOTAL CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION On December 2, 2010, I ordered the defendant, Pivotal Corporation (“Pivotal”) to “comply with my order of October 12, 2010, granting plaintiff’s motion to compel, by December 14, 2010, including making Derrick Anderson available for deposition.” Order of December 2, 2010 [#239]. On December 2, 2010, plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  2. Pulsecard, Inc. v. Discover Card Services, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  3. In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  4. In Re Fannie Mae Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  5. Cambridge Electronics Corp. v. MGA Electronics, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API