Krueger v. Zarley
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.
Plaintiff has appealed from the judgment of the district court which denied his motion for summary judgment, “the court having no jurisdiction,” claiming such action to be in error.
The record itself does not disclose the reason for the trial court’s finding that it had no jurisdiction. Whatever the basis for that finding, the fact remains that generally, a successful challenge to jurisdiction does not constitute a final disposition of a case and is not appealable. Ranch & Farm Lines, Inc. v. Dressman, 185 Neb. 328, 175 N.W.2d 299 (1970); Busboom v. Gregory, 179 Neb. 254, 137 N.W.2d 825 (1965).
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Kaiser Agricultural Chemical Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- SCHMUECKER BROS. IMPLEMENT CO. v. SobotkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Busboom v. GregoryNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
- Ranch & Farm Lines, Inc. v. DressmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gruenewald v. WaaraNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- Keystone Ranch Co. v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1991