Legal Opinion

Tindall v. Sims

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 9, 1948No. Nos. 4-8383, 4-8384PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MoHaney, Justice.

The appeals in the two cases above named are from different courts, but have been consolidated here, because the facts are quite similar, and come from decrees holding loan contracts, evidenced by promissory notes secured by mortgages on real estate, to be usurious and void.

Appellees are Negroes. Appellant is a white man residing in Memphis,' Tennessee. He is engaged in the real estate and loan or loan brokerage business. In the Sims case he says he is in the real estate business and buys commercial paper. In the Jones case he says he has not been in the real estate business…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. TindallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Bank of Dover v. Head (In re Head)District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API