Legal Opinion

Jones v. Tindall

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 16, 1950No. 4-9045PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLeflar, J.

This case, consolidated with another, was before this court in Tindall v. Jones, 212 Ark. 860, 208 S. W. 2d 173. In the 1947 trial from which that appeal arose the Chancellor decreed that a certain loan made by C. A. Tindall to Will and Isabella Jones was usurious, and that notes and a deed of trust incident to the loan should be forfeited and cancelled. Because much of the evidence was vague and uncertain, the case was reversed and remanded for further development, though the companion case, with essentially similar evidence more fully developed, was affirmed. At the new trial, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McDougall v. HachmeisterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. Lanier v. Union Mortgage, Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
  3. Roe v. KiserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  4. City National Bank v. RiggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. Trible v. NicholsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kelly v. NoveySupreme Court of Colorado · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API