Legal Opinion
IN RE PORK ANTITRUST LITIGATION
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 31, 2022No. 0:18-cv-01776Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA IN RE PORK ANTITRUST LITIGATION Case No. 18-cv-1776 (JRT/HB) This Document Relates To: ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL All Class Actions HORMEL AND HORMEL CUSTODIANS TO PRODUCE RESPONSIVE TEXT MESSAGE CONTENT HILDY BOWBEER, United States Magistrate Judge This matter is before the court on Class Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Hormel to Produce Responsive Text Message Content and to Enforce Subpoenas to Hormel Custodians. [ECF No. 883.] Plaintiffs seek an order: (1) compelling defendant Hormel Foods Corporation to produce the text message content of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re: Citric Acid Litigation 7-Up Bottling Co.Of Jasper Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Miscellaneous Docket 1 v. Miscellaneous Docket 2Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Prokosch v. Catalina Lighting, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- Shukh v. Seagate Technology, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. British Aerospace, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.