United States v. Swenson
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
YOUNG, Senior Judge:
Is an accused’s admission that he intends to use a particular illegal drug during a particular time period sufficient to corroborate the accused’s later confession that he used that particular drug during that time frame? We hold that it is.
The appellant was charged with wrongfully using marijuana, cocaine, and lysergc acid diethylamide (LSD), and making false representations about his pre-service drug use to procure his enlistment into the Air Force. Articles 112a, 83, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 912a, 883. The prosecution withdrew the specification alleging…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. AyalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- Warszower v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. RoundsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. McPhersonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
- United States v. BaldwinUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
- United States v. RoblesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000