Legal Opinion

Landham v. Lloyd

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 25, 1931No. 7 Div. 8PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit was for personal injury.

Demurrers were overruled to pleas 2, 3, and 4.

The ruling of the trial court as to plaintiff’s demurrers to pleas 2 and 3 was not in accord with the authorities cited below. The general duty of due care under the circumstances was all the law required of plaintiff. The pleas sought to place on plaintiff a higher duty, or that of a special lookout for approaching cars. The pleas do not aver or show negligence at the time and place in quesr tion. This is the view of SAYRE, BOULDIN, BROWN, FOSTER, JJ., and the writer, ANDERSON, C. J. and GARDNER, J., hold the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Adler v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. McKee v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  3. Karpeles v. City Ice Delivery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Ivy v. MarxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Huey v. DykesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Roan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Ex Parte Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. Rowe v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Edwardson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. State v. BirchWashington Supreme Court · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API