Legal Opinion
Maggio v. Pruzansky
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 18, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
222 N.J. Super. 567 (1988)
537 A.2d 756
CARMEN J. MAGGIO AND EDYTHE MAGGIO, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
STUART PRUZANSKY AND HERMYNE PRUZANSKY, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted January 19, 1988.
Decided February 18, 1988.
Before Judges PETRELLA, BAIME and ASHBEY.
McOmber & McOmber attorneys for appellants (J. Peter Sokol of counsel and on the brief).
Ravin, Greenberg & Zackin attorneys for respondents (Allan M. Harris of counsel and on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by PETRELLA, P.J.A.D.
This appeal involves a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- City of Tonawanda v. Ellicott Creek Homeowners Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Plaza v. FlakSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Taylor v. TrippSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of Guardianship of JTNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Marx v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Stump v. WhibcoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998