Legal Opinion

General Motors v. City of Linden

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 3, 1995PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

279 N.J. Super. 449 (1995)

653 A.2d 568

GENERAL MOTORS CORP., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-CROSS-RESPONDENT,

v.

CITY OF LINDEN, THE ASSESSOR OF LINDEN, AND RICHARD CHAIKEN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-CROSS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 5, 1994.

Decided February 3, 1995.

Before Judges SHEBELL, SKILLMAN and KLEINER.

Kenneth S. Geller, a member of the District of Columbia Bar admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent (Garippa & Davenport, attorneys; John E. Garippa, Philip J. Giannuario, John J. Sullivan and Mr. Geller, on the brief).

Donald…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Grow Company, Inc. v. ChokshiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  2. General Motors Corp. v. City of LindenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  3. NJ Mfrs. Ins. Co. v. Prestige Health Group, LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  4. NEW YORK LIFE v. Lyndhurst Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  5. Wild v. Carriage Funeral Holdings, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API