Southern Fertilizer & Chemical Co. v. Peacock
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Eastman—Judge Neese. August 23, 1916.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
“It may be now considered as settled that this court will .not, under any circumstances, reverse a judgment granting a first new trial, whether the grant be general upon all the grounds of the motion or special upon one or more grounds only, or whether it be upon a ground which involves questions of evidence or upon a ground which involves purely questions of law; unless it is made to appear that no other verdict than ’the one rendered could possibly have been returned under the law and facts of the case. Unless the case can be brought within the exception just stated, it is useless for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weinkle & Sons v. Brunswick & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Cox v. GradySupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Smith v. Maddox-Rucker Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Macon Consolidated Street Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Mock v. Savannah & Statesboro Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Parks v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Chafin v. TumlinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Ellis v. SpellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Williams v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Skipper v. OverallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.