Legal Opinion

Skipper v. Overall

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 6, 1933No. 23061PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. "The first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed unless it appears 'that the judge abused his discretion in granting it, and that the law and facts required the verdict notwithstanding the judgment of the presiding judge.’ Civil Code (1910), § 6204.” Stalnaker v. Beach, 18 Ga. App. 172 (88 S. E. 99) ; Southern Fertilizer Co. v. Peacock, 19 Ga. App. 592 (91 S. E. 928). “This principle in reference to the first grant of a new trial is applicable when the grant is conditional and the condition is not complied with. Harris v. Central Ry. Co., 103 Ga. 495 (30 S. E. 425) ; Wood v. Southern…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern Fertilizer & Chemical Co. v. PeacockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Wood v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Harris v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Stalnaker v. BeachCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  5. Ellis v. SpellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Piedmont Wagon & Manufacturing Co. v. BirdCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API