Hardin v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
BROOKS, Judge.
Appellant wasconvicted of perjury, and Ms punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.
The facts in this case are, in substance, as disclosed by the opinion in the ease of Richard Hardin v. State, 51 Texas Crim. Rep., 559. In that ease appellant’s brother was prosecuted for murder and convicted of manslaughter. On the trial of that case appellant swore, in substance, that he killed the deceased, and not his brother Bicliard. The perjury in this case is predicated Upon said alleged false statement. In other words, appellant and his brother were in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Busby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Dent v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
- Hardin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gaunce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Sweeney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Hardin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Holder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Matthews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.