Busby v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted of misapplication and conversion of public money, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of three years; hence this appeal.
In order to present the legal questions which appellant makes, it becomes necessary to state the case. The record is lengthy and contains much that is calculated to mislead and confuse. Without going into elaborate details, we will summarize what is considered to be the essential features of the case, as made by the State; and then the defenses set up by appellant.
Appellant became what is termed the assistant…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Coffey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- State v. NolandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Fleener v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
- Hollingsworth v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- People v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sharpe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Jernigan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- State v. MorrowOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Oliver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.