Legal Opinion

Bucci v. Kent

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided February 29, 2024No. 2:22-cv-00604Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION GUY RICHARD BUCCI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-cv-00604 BRIAN DOOLEY KENT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On February 5, 2024, I granted in part and denied in part Defendant Brian Dooley Kent’s motion for attorneys’ fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1927. [ECF No. 66]. This statute allows courts to require “any attorney . . . who so multiplies the proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously . . . to satisfy personally the excess costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Robinson v. Equifax Information Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  3. Stephen Six v. Generations Federal CreditCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Geraldine Marie Blodgett, in Re Hector C. Perez, Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Associated Convalescent Enterprises, Inc., United States of America v. Leo Branton, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API