Bucci v. Kent
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION GUY RICHARD BUCCI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-cv-00604 BRIAN DOOLEY KENT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On February 5, 2024, I granted in part and denied in part Defendant Brian Dooley Kent’s motion for attorneys’ fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1927. [ECF No. 66]. This statute allows courts to require “any attorney . . . who so multiplies the proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously . . . to satisfy personally the excess costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Robinson v. Equifax Information Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Stephen Six v. Generations Federal CreditCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Geraldine Marie Blodgett, in Re Hector C. Perez, Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Associated Convalescent Enterprises, Inc., United States of America v. Leo Branton, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.